RESUMO
Objetivo: Evaluar el grado de satisfacción de los pacientes y/o cuidadores con el tratamiento de citrato de fentanilo transmucosa en la gestión de las crisis de dolor irruptivo oncológico en términos de facilidad de uso. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional, prospectivo y multicéntrico con 48 pacientes sometidos a tratamiento de mantenimiento con opioides para el dolor crónico basal provocado por el cáncer y que, además, sufrían crisis de dolor irruptivo para las que estaban recibiendo tratamiento con citrato de fentanilo. La variable principal del estudio fue el grado de satisfacción de los pacientes y/o sus cuidadores con el citrato de fentanilo en el manejo de las crisis de dolor irruptivo oncológico, evaluadas mediante cuestionarios Escala Visual Analógica (EVA). Resultados: El 90,6 % de los pacientes/cuidadores muestran un elevado grado de satisfacción con el empleo de citrato de fentanilo en términos de facilidad de uso (valor medio EVA de 8,2). Por su parte, tanto la valoración general por parte de los pacientes/cuidadores como por parte de los sanitarios ha sido muy positiva (valor medio EVA 7,7). Conclusiones: El citrato de fentanilo es una terapia fácil de usar y eficaz para el tratamiento de las crisis de dolor irruptivo oncológico, con amplia aceptación tanto por parte de pacientes y cuidadores como de los profesionales sanitarios.(AU)
Objective: To assess the degree of satisfaction of patients and/or caregivers with transmucosal fentanyl citrate treatment in the management of breakthrough cancer pain crises in terms of ease of use. Methods: An observational, prospective and multicenter study was carried out with 48 patients undergoing maintenance treatment with opioids for baseline chronic cancer pain and who, in addition, suffered breakthrough pain crises for those who were receiving treatment with fentanyl citrate. The main variable of the study was the degree of satisfaction of the patients and/or their caregivers with fentanyl citrate in the management of breakthrough cancer pain crises, evaluatedby means of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) questionnaires. Results: 90.6 % of patients/caregivers show a high degree of satisfaction with the use of fentanyl citrate in terms of ease of use (mean VAS value of 8.2). For its part, both the general assessment by the patients/caregivers and by the healthcare professionals has been very positive (mean VAS value 7.7). Conclusions: Fentanyl citrate is an easy-to-use and effective therapy for the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain crises, widely accepted by both patients and caregivers as well as health professionals.(AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Satisfação do Paciente , Ácido Cítrico , Dor do Câncer/tratamento farmacológico , Fentanila , Dor Irruptiva/terapia , Administração através da Mucosa , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Medição da Dor , Manejo da Dor , Estudos Prospectivos , Oncologia , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Introducción: en el contexto de la radioterapia, el control del dolor irruptivo oncológico (DIO) supone un reto especial. El DIO ha sido definido por la Sociedad Española del Dolor (SED), la Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica (SEOM) y la Sociedad Española de Cuidados Paliativos (SECPAL) como una exacerbación del dolor súbita y transitoria, de gran intensidad (EVA > 7) y de corta duración (inferior a 20-30 minutos), que aparece sobre la base de un dolor persistente estable cuando este se encuentra reducido a un nivel tolerable (EVA < 5) mediante el uso de opioides mayores. Objetivos: el objetivo principal de este estudio fue evaluar la intensidad del DIO inducido por tratamientos oncológicos que incluyeran radioterapia (RT), tanto exclusiva como asociada a quimioterapia (RT/QT). Secundariamente, se evaluó la eficacia del tratamiento con fentanilo sublingual pautado para el control del DIO. Material y métodos: estudio observacional retrospectivo realizado en 110 pacientes reclutados en 19 Servicios de Radioterapia españoles. Los pacientes debían presentar DIO inducido por RT o RT/QT, con o sin medicación pautada y cuya intensidad fuera de una EVA > 6 en las últimas 24-48 h. Se establecieron controles en el momento basal, y a los 3, 7, 15 y 30 días. Resultados: se apreció un descenso en la media de los valores en la escala EVA según avanzó el estudio (EVA = 6 en el control 0 a EVA = 3 en el control 3), y las diferencias fueron significativas (p < 0,0001). La satisfacción con el tratamiento fue calificada como buena o excelente por el 85,3% de los pacientes y por el 92,7% de los investigadores. Conclusiones: los resultados de este estudio demuestran la eficacia del tratamiento del DIO con fentanilo sublingual en el contexto del tratamiento oncológico radioterápico, con un descenso significativo en los valores EVA frente al valor basal. La elevada satisfacción de los médicos y pacientes con este tratamiento refleja la eficacia y la comodidad del fentanilo sublingual en el control del DIO (AU)
Introduction: In the context of radiotherapy, control of breakthrough cancer pain (BTPc) is particularly challenging. BTPc has been defined by the Spanish Society of Pain (SED), the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) and the Spanish Society for Palliative Care (SECPAL) as a sudden and transient exacerbation of pain of great intensity (VAS > 7) and short (less than 20-30 minutes), which appears on the basis of a stable persistent pain when it is reduced to a tolerable level (VAS < 5) by using major opioids. Objectives: The main objective of this study was to assess the intensity of BTPc induced by cancer treatments that included radiotherapy (RT), both exclusive and associated with chemotherapy (RT/CT). Secondly, the efficacy of treatment was evaluated with fentanyl sublingual scheduled for BTPc control. Material and methods: Retrospective, observational study in 110 patients recruited in 19 Spanish Radiotherapy Services. Patients must have BTPc induced by RT or RT/CT, with or without medication prescribed and with an intensity outside a VAS > 6 in the last 24-48 h. Controls were established at baseline and at 3, 7, 15 and 30 days. Results: There was a decrease in mean values on the VAS scale as the study progressed (VAS = 6 in the control 0 to VAS = 3 in the control 3) and the differences were significant (p < 0.0001). Treatment satisfaction was rated as good or excellent by 85.3% of patients and 92.7% of researches. Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate the efficacy of BTPc treatment with sublingual fentanyl in the context of the radiotherapy cancer treatment, with a significant decrease in VAS from baseline values . The high satisfaction among physicians and patients with this treatment reflects the efficacy and convenience of sublingual fentanyl in controlling BTPc (AU)
Assuntos
Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Manejo da Dor , Radioterapia/efeitos adversos , Radioterapia , Fentanila/uso terapêutico , Medição da Dor/instrumentação , Medição da Dor/métodos , Fentanila/metabolismo , Fentanila/farmacocinética , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Medição da Dor , Estudos Retrospectivos , Clínicas de Dor/normasRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: External irradiation is an accepted curative treatment modality for patients with localized prostatic tumor. The 15-year results in patients treated by radical irradiation alone are presented. The determinant prognostic factors for local tumor control and disease free survival are analyzed. METHODS: 135 patients with a histologically confirmed localized carcinoma of the prostate were treated at our department from May 1972 to January 1998. Fifty patients received Co-60 therapy; the linear accelerator and high energy photons were utilized in the remaining 80 patients. By tumor stage, 53 patients were B1, 49 B2 and 33 C. The mean follow-up was 61 months (range 1-180). Most patients were exposed to localized fields of irradiation; dose ranged from 50-74 Gy, fractionated at a dose of 180-200 cGy/day. RESULTS: Overall local tumor control was 77% at 5 years and 73% at 15 years, with a disease free survival of 63% and 45% at 5 and 15 years, respectively. Local tumor control at 13 years was 71% for stage B1, 82% for B2 and 70% for C. The disease free survival at 13 years for stages B1, B2 and C were 46%, 49% and 36%, respectively. The BD and MD tumors had a 15-year disease free survival of 48% vs 32% for the PD tumors (p = 0.005). Patients with PSA < or = 20 ng/ml before treatment showed a disease free survival of 87% vs 48% for those with PSA > 20 ng/ml ((p = 0.011). Multivariate analysis showed dose to be a determinant prognostic factor for local tumor control (0.0432); dose and histological grade were determinants for disease free survival (p = 0.029 and 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study found dose to be a determinant prognostic factor for local tumor control and both dose and histological grade were determinants for disease free survival. Radiotherapy is a therapeutic option for these patients. The results can be enhanced if the dose delivered to the prostate can be increased while maintaining the complication rate within the same ranges.
